ASN Aircraft accident McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30CF PH-MBN Faro Airport (FAO)
ASN logo
 
 
Status:Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Date:Monday 21 December 1992
Time:08:33
Type:Silhouette image of generic DC10 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different
McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30CF
Operator:Martinair Holland
Registration: PH-MBN
MSN: 46924/218
First flight: 1975
Total airframe hrs:61543
Cycles:14615
Engines: 3 General Electric CF6-50C
Crew:Fatalities: 2 / Occupants: 13
Passengers:Fatalities: 54 / Occupants: 327
Total:Fatalities: 56 / Occupants: 340
Aircraft damage: Damaged beyond repair
Location:Faro Airport (FAO) (   Portugal)
Phase: Landing (LDG)
Nature:Int'l Non Scheduled Passenger
Departure airport:Amsterdam-Schiphol International Airport (AMS/EHAM), Netherlands
Destination airport:Faro Airport (FAO/LPFR), Portugal
Flightnumber: 495
Narrative:
At 05:52 LT Flight 495 took off from Amsterdam for a flight to Faro. The flight had been delayed for 40 minutes due to no. 2 engine reverser problems. After a flight of 2 and 17 minutes a the flight was cleared to descend to FL70. Shortly afterwards Faro Approach Control provided the crew with the following weather: wind 15deg./18 kts; 2500 m visibility; thunderstorms with 3/8 clouds at 500 feet, 7/8 clouds at 2300 feet and 1/8 cumulonimbus at 2500 feet, temp. 16deg. C.
Clearance to descend to 1220 m was given at 08:20, followed by a clearance to 915 m and 650 m 4, resp. 6 minutes later. At 08:29 the crew were informed that the runway was flooded. At an altitude of 303 m and 140 knots speed the approach became unstable and at 177 m the first officer switched the autopilot from CMD (command mode) to CWS (control-wheel steering). One minute later it was switched from CWS to manual and the airspeed began falling below approach reference speed. About 3-4 seconds short of touchdown elevator was pulled to pitch up and engine power was increased. When the no. 3 and 5 spoilers extended, the aircraft had a 25deg. bank, left wing up. The right main gear contacted the runway with a 900 feet/min descent rate at 126 knots, +8.79deg. pitch up, +5.62deg roll and 1,9533G. The right wing separated while the aircraft slid down the runway. The aircraft came to rest 1100 m from the runway 11 threshold and 100 m to the right of the centreline and caught fire.

Probable Cause:

PROBABLE CAUSES: "The high rate of descent in the final phase of the approach and the landing made on the right landing gear, which exceeded the structural limitations of the aircraft.; The crosswind, which exceeded the aircrafts limits and which occurred in the final phase of the approach and during landing. The combination of both factors determined stresses which exceeded the structural limitations of the aircraft.
Contributing factors were: The instability of the approach; the premature power reduction, and the sustaining of this condition, probably due to crew action; the incorrect wind information delivered by Approach Control; the absence of an approach light system; the incorrect evaluation by the crew of the runway conditions; CWS mode being switched off at approx. 80ft RA, causing the aircraft to be in manual control in a critical phase of the landing; the delayed action of the crew in increasing power; the degradation of the lift coefficient due to heavy showers." (DGAC Portugal)

The Netherlands Aviation Safety Board commented that the probable cause should read: "a sudden and unexpected wind variation in direction and speed (windshear) in the final stage of the approach. Subsequently a high rate of descent and an extreme lateral displacement developed, causing a hard landing on the right-hand main gear, which in combination with a considerable crab angle exceeded the aircraft structural limitations.
Contributing factors: From the forecast and the prevailing weather the crew of MP495 did not expect the existence of windshear phenomena.; The premature large power reduction and sustained flight idle thrust, most probable due to crew action.; CWS mode being disengaged at approx. 80ft RA, causing the aircraft to be in manual control at a critical stage in the landing phase."

Accident investigation:

cover
Investigating agency: GPIA Portugal
Status: Investigation completed
Accident number: 22/ACCID/GPI/92
Download report: Final report

Classification:
Windshear/downdraft
Heavy landing
Runway mishap

Sources:
» Flight Crew of DC-10 Encounters Microburst During Unstabilized Approach, Ending in Runway Accident (Flight Safety Foundation - Accident Prevention August 1996)
» Air Safety Week 4 January 1993 (p. 1, 2)


Photos

photo of DC-10-30CF-PH-MBN
accident date: 21-12-1992
type: McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30CF
registration: PH-MBN
photo of DC-10-30CF-PH-MBN
accident date: 21-12-1992
type: McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30CF
registration: PH-MBN
photo of DC-10-30CF-PH-MBN
accident date: 21-12-1992
type: McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30CF
registration: PH-MBN
photo of DC-10-30CF-PH-MBN
accident date: 21-12-1992
type: McDonnell Douglas DC-10-30CF
registration: PH-MBN
 

Map
This map shows the airport of departure and the intended destination of the flight. The line between the airports does not display the exact flight path.
Distance from Amsterdam-Schiphol International Airport to Faro Airport as the crow flies is 1955 km (1222 miles).
Accident location: Exact; as reported in the official accident report.

This information is not presented as the Flight Safety Foundation or the Aviation Safety Network’s opinion as to the cause of the accident. It is preliminary and is based on the facts as they are known at this time.
languages: languages

Share

DC-10

  • 446 built
  • 20th loss
  • 12th fatal accident
  • 8th worst accident
» safety profile

 Portugal
  • 5th worst accident
» safety profile

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org