Accident Luscombe 8A N72066,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 211768
 
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Friday 1 June 2018
Time:07:34
Type:Silhouette image of generic L8 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Luscombe 8A
Owner/operator:Private
Registration: N72066
MSN: 3493
Total airframe hrs:1450 hours
Engine model:Continental C65
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2
Aircraft damage: Substantial
Category:Accident
Location:East Side Airport (3TS0), Longview, TX -   United States of America
Phase: Take off
Nature:Test
Departure airport:Longview, TX (3TS0)
Destination airport:Longview, TX (3TS0)
Investigating agency: NTSB
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
The commercial pilot departed on the personal flight with about half fuel. During the departure climb, the airplane experienced a loss of engine power. The pilot subsequently performed a forced landing to a field, and, during touchdown, the airplane nosed over and impacted the ground. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal engine operation. The pilot reported that he did not use carburetor heat during the takeoff. The use of full carburetor heat during takeoff and landing was stipulated by the airplane's type certificate data sheet, which indicated that a placard is required stating, “Full carburetor air heat required for takeoff and landing.” However, the accident airplane did not have that placard installed.
Further, a special airworthiness information bulletin (SAIB) applicable to this airplane configuration noted the need for procedures to prevent the possible loss of power on takeoff and climb and stated that flight testing revealed that fuel flow could be interrupted from the fuselage-mounted tank as a result of acceleration and higher pitch attitudes commonly encountered in takeoff and climb. The SAIB stated that the use of full carburetor heat on takeoff is unconventional yet necessary to ensure continuous fuel flow to the engine. Thus, the pilot’s failure to use carburetor heat resulted in the loss of engine power.




Probable Cause: The pilot's failure to use carburetor heat for takeoff, which resulted in an interruption of continuous fuel flow to the engine and a loss of engine power during climb. Also causal was the lack of required placarding warning of the need to use full carburetor heat on takeoff and landing.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: NTSB
Report number: CEN18LA209
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 1 year and 5 months
Download report: Final report

Sources:

NTSB

Location

Media:

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
01-Jun-2018 13:57 Geno Added
01-Jun-2018 14:00 Geno Updated [Location]
01-Jun-2018 14:26 Iceman 29 Updated [Time, Aircraft type, Registration, Cn, Operator, Location, Source, Embed code]
01-Jun-2018 15:45 Anon. Updated [Embed code, Damage]
01-Jun-2018 15:46 harro Updated [Aircraft type]
27-Nov-2019 07:18 ASN Update Bot Updated [Time, Nature, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Embed code, Damage, Narrative, Accident report, ]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org