Accident Piper PA-31T Cheyenne II N909PW,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 217616
 
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Monday 5 December 2016
Time:13:00
Type:Silhouette image of generic PAY2 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Piper PA-31T Cheyenne II
Owner/operator:Private
Registration: N909PW
MSN: 31T-7720060
Year of manufacture:1977
Total airframe hrs:6850 hours
Engine model:P&W PT6A SER
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2
Aircraft damage: Substantial
Category:Accident
Location:Missoula, MT -   United States of America
Phase: En route
Nature:Private
Departure airport:Kalispell, MT (S27)
Destination airport:Las Vegas, NV (LAS)
Investigating agency: NTSB
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
The private pilot reported that, during cruise flight, the left windshield suddenly departed the airplane. The airplane was below its published service ceiling of 29,000 ft and the windshield was not subjected to internal pressure above its limitations at the time of the failure. The pilot entered an emergency descent and landed the airplane at an airport without further incident. The lack of windshield debris in the cockpit and the glass embedded in the left propeller indicated that the left windshield blew outward. Examination of the right windshield, which remained on the airplane, revealed evidence of moisture ingression into the laminate, to include cloudiness in the vinyl layer, interlayer cracking, delamination around the edges of the windshield, and corrosion of the aluminum retainer. Remnants of the left windshield were insufficient to establish if the laminate exhibited the same evidence of moisture ingression. Examination of the right windshield showed that the discrepancies were consistent with delamination as defined in the manufacturer’s service manual. The discrepant areas had only progressed up to ½ inch into the daylight opening. The cloudiness, interlayer cracking, and delamination noted along the upper and lower edges of the right windshield were visible to the pilot before the accident flight. However, the delamination of the right windshield would not have necessitated immediate replacement based on the published service information, and although it is impossible to determine the condition of the left windshield before the flight, it was likely similar to that of the right windshield.
The left windshield aluminum retainer exhibited corrosion around the periphery that was more extensive than that on the right windshield. The corrosion of the aluminum retainer is impossible to see with the windshields installed in the airplane, since the fuselage windshield frame covers the entire flange area.
Windshields were designed in a manner to transfer their internal stresses equally around the windshield into the airframe structure. The corrosion of the aluminum retainer eliminated the load path for the internal windshield stresses to be transferred to the airframe. For each of the corroded areas on the aluminum retainer, there would have to be a redistribution of the internal stresses toward the intact areas, which would cause significant stress concentrations in the windshield laminate. These stress concentrations could be high enough to exceed the capabilities of the laminate in local areas. If coupled with a fracture of one glass layer, the stress concentration would be intensified even more adjacent to the corroded retainer areas. The corroded retainer on the left windshield led to areas of stress concentration within the windshield laminate.
The precise initiation of the left windshield failure could not be conclusively determined. The little amount of glass remaining suggested that the fracture of the glass layers initiated in the aft portion of the windshield near the center. It is possible there was a peel chip that began the event, or simply that the stress concentrations adjacent to the corroded retainer were high enough to cause failure of the windshield laminate.



Probable Cause: Failure of the left windshield due to moisture ingression into the windshield laminate, which deteriorated the strength of the windshield.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: NTSB
Report number: WPR17LA031
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 1 year and 11 months
Download report: Final report

Sources:

NTSB

Location

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
11-Nov-2018 08:36 ASN Update Bot Added

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org