ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 291690
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.
| Date: | Monday 23 October 2006 |
| Time: | 14:00 LT |
| Type: |  Rockwell Commander 112 |
| Owner/operator: | Private |
| Registration: | N1022J |
| MSN: | 22 |
| Year of manufacture: | 1973 |
| Total airframe hrs: | 2838 hours |
| Engine model: | Lycoming IO-360 |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2 |
| Aircraft damage: | Substantial |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | Chino, California -
 United States of America
|
| Phase: | Unknown |
| Nature: | Training |
| Departure airport: | Chino Airport, CA (CNO/KCNO) |
| Chino Airport, CA (CNO/KCNO) | |
| Investigating agency: | NTSB |
| Confidence Rating: |  Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
During the takeoff climb the engine began to run rough, and was not producing enough power to sustain flight. The certified flight instructor (CFI) reported that there was no remaining runway when the engine began to lose power, and he made a forced landing in an open field. An annual inspection had been completed on the airplane 14 days prior to the accident, and this was the first flight since the inspection. During the annual inspection, the fuel system had been inspected. The inspection included de-fueling the fuel tanks to seal the wing leading edge rivets. The fuel tanks were serviced, and no leaks were observed. An inspection checklist for the fuel system identified various items for inspection at the 50 and 100-hour inspections. During the 50-hour inspection, the drain valves, vent lines and vents, filler cap, anti-siphoning valves, and fuel system placards are examined. In the 100-hour inspection, the internal tank inspection, gages, transmitters, fuel line fittings, vent lines, and vents, and the fuel vent line drain assembly beneath the fuselage is removed and cleaned. Following the annual inspection, the airplane sat on the ramp for 2 weeks before the accident flight. On the accident flight, the CFI stated that he and the owner/passenger did a thorough preflight with no discrepancies noted. According to the flight manual, during the preflight inspection, the pilot is to check that both the left and right wing fuel tank vents are unobstructed. The postaccident airframe inspection revealed that the left and right wings' fuel vent lines were clogged with dirt at each end, and their associated unions were also packed with dirt. The vent lines and unions were removed and shipped to the Safety Board's materials laboratory for further inspection. The fuel vent lines were found intermittently clogged with dirt at multiple locations along the length of the lines. The vent lines were cut open and the dirt removed for examination. Insect carcasses were found in the vent lines. According to the airframe manufacturer, there are three fuel vent lines; one at each wing, and one located on the belly of the airplane. If both the main fuel vent lines (left and right wings) become clogged, the belly fuel vent line would not be able to compensate for the clogged vent lines, and fuel flow to the engine would be restricted.
Probable Cause: A loss of engine power during the initial climb after takeoff due to blocked fuel vent lines that resulted in fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was an inadequate preflight inspection by the pilot-in-command (CFI).
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Sources:
NTSB LAX07LA020
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
|---|---|---|
| 07-Oct-2022 17:45 | ASN Update Bot | Added |
Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:
| ASN Home | Send Correction / Feedback |
| FSF Home | Disclaimer | Copyright |
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy |
| Press / Media |
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation