ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 189026
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.
| Date: | Tuesday 2 August 2016 |
| Time: | 21:22 |
| Type: |  Piper PA-34-200T |
| Owner/operator: | Private |
| Registration: | N82806 |
| MSN: | 34-8170021 |
| Year of manufacture: | 1980 |
| Total airframe hrs: | 7453 hours |
| Engine model: | Continental TSIO-360 SER |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 1 / Occupants: 1 |
| Aircraft damage: | Destroyed |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | near Flagstaff, AZ -
 United States of America
|
| Phase: | Initial climb |
| Nature: | Private |
| Departure airport: | Flagstaff, AZ (FLG) |
| Mesa, AZ (FFZ) | |
| Investigating agency: | NTSB |
| Confidence Rating: |  Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
The airline transport pilot regularly used his twin-engine airplane to conduct volunteer flights for a non-profit organization dedicated to transporting medical cargo. On the day of the accident, he departed his home airport about 0945, made a planned interim stop at one airport, and then flew to a second airport, where he waited for his next cargo pickup. The cargo was delivered to him, as scheduled, about 2100, and he departed shortly thereafter on a night visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country flight. The air traffic control tower was closed at the time of the pilot's departure. The airport was situated in semi-rural, mountainous terrain, and both the sun and the moon had set about 2 hours before takeoff.
Ground-based tracking radar data indicated that the airplane departed to the southwest, turned west, then south, and then north before it descended rapidly and impacted trees and terrain about 2.5 minutes after takeoff. The first segment of the radar-derived trajectory was consistent with a normal takeoff and initial climb. About 1 minute after takeoff, some undetermined occurrence(s) or circumstance(s) interrupted the climb and resulted in the course deviations and the extreme descent.
Examination of the accident site indicated that the airplane was in a banked attitude when it impacted the trees. The available evidence indicated that both engines were developing significant power at impact, and that the propellers were operating normally. No evidence of a bird strike or an in-flight fire was observed. With the exception that one of the two instrument air pressure pumps were inoperative, the investigation did not discover evidence of any pre-impact mechanical deficiencies with the airplane or its equipment. However, the wreckage was highly fragmented, which could have masked or destroyed such evidence.
The artificial horizon and the directional gyro were two of the flight instruments that were driven by the air pressure pumps. Although the two air pressure pumps and associated valving were designed to provide automatic continued normal system operation in the event of a single air pressure pump failure, the severity of the damage precluded determination of the pre-accident functionality of the instrument air system. Therefore, it is possible that a failure of the valving system could have resulted in the loss of valid artificial horizon and directional gyro information, which in turn, due to the dark night and scarcity of ground lights, could have resulted in the accident.
Damage also precluded testing of the autopilot system. However, the pilot typically hand-flew the airplane to cruise altitude before engaging the autopilot; therefore, the accident was likely not due to an autopilot malfunction.
Although the departure airport automated weather observation reported 10 miles visibility with no clouds less than 10,000 ft above the airport, the heavy rain earlier in the day, combined with nighttime cooling and the lack of a temperature-dew point spread, suggested the potential for localized low altitude clouds or fog.
Given the dark night and the lack of significant ground lighting, pilot disorientation for a variety of reasons could not be discounted. The most likely possible reasons included:
- Distraction from some unknown event inside or outside the airplane
- Malfunction or failure of one or more flight instruments
- Inadvertent encounter with localized instrument meteorological conditions
Probable Cause: A departure flight path that consisted of several unexplained turns during the initial climbout, and terminated in a high-speed descent and ground impact. The reason(s) for the turns and descent could not be determined due to lack of definitive evidence.
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Sources:
NTSB
https://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N82806
Location
Media:
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
|---|---|---|
| 03-Aug-2016 13:38 | gerard57 | Added |
| 03-Aug-2016 13:45 | harro | Updated [Aircraft type, Total occupants, Location, Source, Narrative] |
| 03-Aug-2016 18:16 | Iceman 29 | Updated [Aircraft type, Registration, Cn, Operator, Source] |
| 04-Aug-2016 09:39 | Iceman 29 | Updated [Destination airport, Source, Embed code, Narrative] |
| 15-Aug-2016 19:57 | Aerossurance | Updated [Time, Phase, Nature, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Narrative] |
| 21-Jun-2018 19:59 | ASN Update Bot | Updated [Time, Operator, Nature, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Narrative] |
| 22-Jun-2018 06:14 | ASN Update Bot | Updated [Source] |
| 23-Jun-2018 09:46 | harro | Updated [Source, Narrative] |
Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:
| ASN Home | Send Correction / Feedback |
| FSF Home | Disclaimer | Copyright |
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy |
| Press / Media |
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation