Accident Flightstar II N953RJ,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 213678
 
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Friday 27 July 2018
Time:16:45
Type:Silhouette image of generic fsii model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Flightstar II
Owner/operator:Private
Registration: N953RJ
MSN: 325
Year of manufacture:2001
Engine model:HKS 700E
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2
Aircraft damage: Substantial
Category:Accident
Location:S of Concord Airpark (2G1), Painesville, OH -   United States of America
Phase: Approach
Nature:Private
Departure airport:Painesville, OH (2G1)
Destination airport:Painesville, OH (2G1)
Investigating agency: NTSB
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
The student pilot reported that he and his wife owned the accident airplane and had made multiple practice taxi runs on the runway with no intention for flight. During one of the taxi runs, the airplane unexpectedly became airborne. The student determined that there was not enough runway remaining to perform a safe landing, so he chose to continue the takeoff. Once the airplane reached about 100 ft above ground level, it would no longer climb, and he attempted to land in a field; however, the airplane struck trees before reaching the intended field.
Before the accident, the student had performed maintenance on the airplane, which included replacing the propeller. He had intended to have a certificated mechanic check his work but had not done so before the accident because there was no intention for flight. He acknowledged that he may not have set the propeller pitch correctly, which could have negatively affected the airplane’s performance. In addition, the atmospheric conditions were favorable for moderate icing at cruise power settings and serious icing at descent power settings. Carburetor icing likely accumulated during the multiple taxi runs performed before the unintentional flight.
Based on the available information, the airplane inadvertently became airborne because the student allowed it to accelerate to flight speed. The available engine power was likely reduced due to an improper propeller pitch setting and carburetor icing, and both these conditions likely resulted in the airplane’s inability to continue to climb.



Probable Cause: The student pilot’s failure to maintain an airspeed below flight speed during a practice taxi run, which resulted in the airplane inadvertently becoming airborne. Once airborne, the reduced engine power due to an improper propeller pitch setting and carburetor icing degraded the airplane’s performance and prevented the airplane from being able to continue to climb.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: NTSB
Report number: CEN18LA301
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 1 year and 3 months
Download report: Final report

Sources:

NTSB

Location

Media:

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
28-Jul-2018 00:00 Geno Added
28-Jul-2018 00:47 Geno Updated [Aircraft type, Source]
28-Jul-2018 07:37 Iceman 29 Updated [Source, Embed code, Damage]
28-Jul-2018 16:55 Aerossurance Updated [Time, Operator, Location, Nature, Source, Embed code, Narrative, Plane category]
13-Feb-2019 07:51 harro Updated [Time, Registration, Phase, Nature, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Narrative]
12-Nov-2019 17:49 ASN Update Bot Updated [Time, Cn, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Damage, Narrative, Plane category, Accident report, ]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org