Accident Cessna 140 N76075,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 278293
 
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Friday 20 May 2022
Time:18:42
Type:Silhouette image of generic C140 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Cessna 140
Owner/operator:Private
Registration: N76075
MSN: 10469
Year of manufacture:1946
Total airframe hrs:3029 hours
Engine model:Continental C85
Fatalities:Fatalities: 1 / Occupants: 1
Aircraft damage: Destroyed
Category:Accident
Location:near Wayne Municipal/Stan Morris Field (LCG/KLCG), Wayne, NE -   United States of America
Phase: Approach
Nature:Demo/Airshow/Display
Departure airport:Wayne Municipal Airport, NE (KLCG)
Destination airport:Wayne Municipal Airport, NE (KLCG)
Investigating agency: NTSB
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
On May 20, 2022, about 1842 central standard time, a Cessna 140 airplane, N76075, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain near the Wayne Municipal Airport (LCG), Wayne, Nebraska. The private pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated by the pilot under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.

The accident pilot had planned to participate in an aviation event that involved a form of air racing called short takeoff and landing drag racing (STOL Drag). On the day of the accident, in the afternoon, the aviation event was supposed to begin with STOL Drag qualification racing; however, the air racing was postponed to the following day due to gusting wind conditions that were oriented in an unfavorable direction relative to the orientation of the racecourse.

After the postponement decision was made, several of the competing pilots expressed a desire to perform traditional STOL (without any drag racing component) on a grass runway where a more favorable, but gusty, headwind prevailed. A safety briefing was held with representatives of the event organizer, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors who were on site to supervise the STOL Drag event, and pilots who planned to fly in the traditional STOL. A representative of the STOL Drag event organizer informed the pilots that the flying was optional, and it was not a part of the formal air race competition. To limit traffic pattern congestion, multiple groups of 5 airplanes were organized.

According to witnesses and video/photographic evidence, the accident airplane was the last airplane within a group of 5, and all 5 airplanes had each performed two landings without incident. During the third approach, while the accident airplane was on final approach following a slower airplane ahead also on final approach, the accident airplane descended and appeared to be lower than the airplane ahead of it. Subsequently, the accident airplane's pitch attitude increased, it rolled to the right, completed a 3/4-turn right spin, and impacted terrain in a near-vertical attitude. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine found no evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Based on this information, it is likely that the accident pilot allowed the airplane to exceed its critical angle of attack while on final approach and the airplane entered an aerodynamic stall and spin at too low an altitude to successfully recover. The strong, gusting wind conditions increased the likelihood of a sudden increase in angle of attack as the pilot approached the runway at a slow speed, already operating near the airplane's critical angle of attack.

The evidence further showed that the accident pilot turned onto final approach early and, as a result, may have been altering his approach path and speed to maintain spacing behind the slower airplane ahead. If the pilot observed his airspeed decaying, given the lack of spacing ahead, adding engine power and/or increasing airspeed would only exacerbate the already close spacing with the airplane ahead. In this case, the only alternative would have been for the pilot to execute a go-around. Additionally, review of high-resolution photographs showed no evidence that the airplane's flaps had been extended on final approach, despite having used flaps for the prior landings. Data from the airplane's operations manual showed that extending the flaps would result in the airplane's stall speed being about 5 mph slower, all other factors being equal. It could not be determined whether the pilot inadvertently forgot to extend the flaps during the landing attempt or had chosen not to extend them due to the gusting wind conditions.

The pilot's loss of control occurred during non-traditional traffic pattern operations, and other factors may also have contributed to the pilot's loss of control in flight. The pilot was flying an approach in which his touchdown and landing distance would be measured and judged by spectators and fellow pilots. Regardless of whether the STOL activity being conducted at the time of the accident was part of an official competition, it is likely that the pilot's approach was influenced by the competitive environment. The gusting wind should have resulted in the pilot increasing the airplane's speed on final approach; however, doing so would conflict with the desire to perform a competitive STOL landing. Additionally, while the accident pilot had completed STOL Drag training and was certified to compete in STOL Drag racing, no training was required of the pilots participating in the impromptu traditional STOL operations, which was a characteristically different flight activity as compared to STOL Drag racing in which airplanes do not exit ground effect.

An FAA-issued a Certificate of Waiver (CoW), outlined several exceptions to aviation regulations that were required in order to conduct the STOL Drag event. The CoW, in addition to a National Air Race Accreditation Letter and associated policies and procedures, incorporated risk mitigations that included a variety of elements, such as requirements for pilot training and certification, as well as operational wind limitations; however, these risk management controls were not present for the impromptu traditional STOL operations in which the accident pilot was participating. Had risk mitigations like those that were planned for the STOL Drag event been in place and adhered to by the event organizers and the FAA personnel present, it is possible that the accident could have been avoided.

Probable Cause: The pilot's exceedance of the airplane's critical angle of attack on final approach while conducting traditional short takeoff and landing operations in gusting wind conditions, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and spin from which the pilot could not recover. Contributing to the accident was the competitive environment, which likely influenced the pilot's approach speed and the subsequent loss of control.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: NTSB
Report number: ERA22FA233
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 1 year and 5 months
Download report: Final report

Sources:

NTSB ERA22FA233


FAA register: https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=76075

Location

Images:



Media:

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
21-May-2022 05:23 nhofmann54 Added
21-May-2022 05:24 harro Updated [Aircraft type, Registration, Cn, Operator, Location, Source, Embed code]
21-May-2022 05:31 harro Updated [Time, Aircraft type, Registration, Cn, Departure airport, Source]
21-May-2022 11:51 johnwg Updated [Time, Location, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Embed code, Narrative, Category]
21-May-2022 11:53 johnwg Updated [[Time, Location, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Embed code, Narrative, Category]]
21-May-2022 12:02 johnwg Updated [Departure airport, Destination airport]
22-May-2022 02:52 RobertMB Updated [Time, Operator, Location, Narrative]
22-May-2022 12:11 johnwg Updated [Source, Embed code, Narrative]
23-May-2022 05:31 Anon. Updated [Embed code]
25-May-2022 08:54 harro Updated [Source, Embed code]
25-May-2022 14:58 johnwg Updated [Source]
01-Jun-2022 13:23 Captain Adam Updated [Time, Source, Embed code, Narrative, Category]
10-Jun-2022 13:26 johnwg Updated [Source]
26-Oct-2023 06:50 ASN Update Bot Updated [[Source]]
26-Oct-2023 06:50 harro Updated [[[Source]]]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org