ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 289384
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.
| Date: | Saturday 16 April 2011 |
| Time: | 08:00 LT |
| Type: |  Cessna 172S |
| Owner/operator: | Westwind School Of Aeronautics |
| Registration: | N1835U |
| MSN: | 172S9922 |
| Year of manufacture: | 2005 |
| Total airframe hrs: | 2819 hours |
| Engine model: | Lycoming IO-360 |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2 |
| Aircraft damage: | Substantial |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | Payson, Arizona -
 United States of America
|
| Phase: | Initial climb |
| Nature: | Training |
| Departure airport: | Phoenix-Deer Valley Airport, AZ (DVT/KDVT) |
| Payson Airport, AZ (PJB/KPAN) | |
| Investigating agency: | NTSB |
| Confidence Rating: |  Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
The private pilot and his passenger departed on a flight to an airport with an elevation of 5,157 feet mean sea level (msl), and a density altitude of about 6,200 feet. Although the pilot had received classroom instruction on high elevation airport, high density altitude operations, the flight was his first to a high elevation airport, and he planned to conduct his first landing there as a touch-and-go. After touchdown, the pilot retracted the flaps, applied full throttle, and lifted off. The pilot perceived that the airplane was underperforming on the climbout, and he enriched the fuel-air mixture, which did not rectify the problem. The engine was making "popping" sounds, the airspeed was lower than normal, and the tachometer indicated about 500 rpm less than the target value. The pilot began a right turn back toward the airport, and lowered the airplane's nose to increase airspeed, but the airplane entered a spin and impacted terrain. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine did not reveal any preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation.
Review of the pilot's history revealed that he received all his training and flight experience through a flight school that was based at an airport with an elevation of about 1,500 feet msl. The pilot's full enrichment of the mixture for the takeoff and climbout at the destination airport was contrary to the procedure published in the airplane manufacturer's Pilot's Operating Handbook, which stated that the mixture was to be leaned for maximum rpm. Considering the dynamic conditions and limited time available to ensure proper mixture adjustment during a touch-and-go landing at a high-elevation airport, and the effect of an improper mixture on airplane climb capability at such an airport, the pilot deprived himself of potential safety margins by deciding to conduct his arrival as a touch and go. His lack of any prior operations at high elevation airports further reduced his safety margin by depriving him of applicable experience. Subsequent to the accident, the pilot's flight school implemented several new policies regarding operations at high elevation airports, including a prohibition against pilots operating solo at such airports until they have done so with a flight instructor.
Probable Cause: The pilot's decision to conduct a touch-and-go arrival during his first flight to a high elevation airport, which resulted in an improper mixture adjustment and a partial loss of engine power for the takeoff and attempted climbout.
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Sources:
NTSB WPR11LA201
Location
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
|---|---|---|
| 05-Oct-2022 13:07 | ASN Update Bot | Added |
Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:
| ASN Home | Send Correction / Feedback |
| FSF Home | Disclaimer | Copyright |
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy |
| Press / Media |
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation