Wirestrike Accident Bell 206 L3 Long Ranger P2-SIL,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 300093
 
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Tuesday 4 October 2022
Time:15:10
Type:Silhouette image of generic B06 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Bell 206 L3 Long Ranger
Owner/operator:SIL Aviation
Registration: P2-SIL
MSN: 51511
Year of manufacture:1991
Total airframe hrs:8049 hours
Engine model:Rolls-Royce 250-C30P
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 6
Aircraft damage: Substantial
Category:Accident
Location:Aiyura National High School -   Papua New Guinea
Phase: Take off
Nature:Passenger - Non-Scheduled/charter/Air Taxi
Departure airport:Aiyura National School
Destination airport:Lae-Nadzab Airport (LAE/AYNZ)
Investigating agency: PNG AIC
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
A Bell 206 L3 helicopter, registered P2-SIL, owned and operated by Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) Aviation, was conducting a VFR charter flight from Aiyura National School, in Ukarumpa, to Nadzab
Airport, Lae, Papua New Guinea when, during take-off, the tail rotor struck a power line. The helicopter was subsequently landed without further event.

Causes [Contributing factors]
- The pilot taxied to his nominated departure position which was unbeknownst to him. Within collision proximity of suspended powerlines where during a turn to line up for departure, the tail rotor blades struck one of the powerlines.
- The distance at which the pilot was assessing the powerlines was considered too far to
accurately judge distance.
- The powerlines, with the surrounding environment, presented an optical illusion which caused the pilot, at the distance from which he was observing the powerlines, to perceive.
- The erroneous perception resulted in misguided decisions.
- The high workload on the day would have caused a reduction in attentiveness and vigilance.
- The reduced effectiveness of the pilot’ scan and continued verification of initial perceptions made it difficult to detect perception of the powerlines were further away than they actually were.
- The departure position was selected by the pilot during pre-flight obstacle assessment following the erroneous perception of the observed powerlines position.
- The pilot perceived the suspended powerlines to be further away from the field than they were. The pilot assessed the powerlines and judged the powerlines distance from a distance that the normal human eyes are considered not reliable for accurately determining distance.
- The pilot was not aware of the actual environment and his cognitive limitation which led to a strong sense of full situational awareness. This affected the pilot’s ability to maintain a vigilant look out to verify the environment for any unsafe situations.
- The investigation considers that the fact that the pilot worked through a full day with activities still ahead, the pilot may have been fatigued and reduced vigilance and attention.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: PNG AIC
Report number: AIC 22-1003
Status: Investigation completed
Duration: 1 year 1 month
Download report: Final report

Sources:

AIC PNG

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
22-Oct-2022 09:57 harro Added
05-Nov-2022 09:54 harro Updated [Time, Nature, Departure airport, Destination airport, Source, Damage, Narrative, Category]
27-Nov-2023 18:57 harro Updated [Other fatalities, Source, Narrative, Accident report]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org