Serious incident Boeing 737-3S3 PR-SDL,
ASN logo
ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 317482
 
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Tuesday 9 June 2015
Time:16:05 UTC
Type:Silhouette image of generic B733 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Boeing 737-3S3
Owner/operator:Sideral Linhas Aéreas
Registration: PR-SDL
MSN: 24060/1519
Year of manufacture:1988
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 2
Aircraft damage: Minor
Category:Serious incident
Location:São Luís-Marechal Cunha Machado Airport, MA (SLZ/SBSL) -   Brazil
Phase: Landing
Nature:Cargo
Departure airport:Teresina-Senador Petrônio Portela Airport, PI (THE/SBTE)
Destination airport:São Luís-Marechal Cunha Machado Airport, MA (SLZ/SBSL)
Investigating agency: CENIPA
Confidence Rating: Accident investigation report completed and information captured
Narrative:
At approximately 15 NM from SBSL, the crew requested to cancel the instrument flight plan (IFR), initiated a visual flight rules (VFR) approach and executed a right base leg to runway 06.
During flare for landing, the right wing tip touched the runway.
The aircraft had minor damage. The crew members were unharmed.

Contributing factors.
- Application of controls - contributed.
At the time of landing, the aircraft exceeded the roll angle limit by 3.5° for a pitch angle of 4°, which explains the wing touching the runway.
These pitch and roll angles were commanded with the objective of keeping the aircraft on the runway, but resulted in the extrapolation of operational limits of the equipment, characterizing an inadequate use of flight controls.
- Pilotage Judgement - contributed.
The representation of the aircraft trajectory, from the recorded data, shows that there was no defined final straight, characterizing a non-stabilized approach.
Without considering the alternative of executing a missed approach, it was erroneously judged that it had full control of the situation and proceeded to land in a condition that resulted in the extrapolation of equipment operational limits, which culminated in the wing touching the runway surface.
Thus, the inadequate assessment of certain parameters related to the operation of the aircraft, particularly with regard to the good practice of executing a stabilized approach and the influence of the wind at the time of landing, contributed to the occurrence.
- Decision-making process - contributed.
The inadequate judgment of the approach, possibly caused by the difficulty to perceive that the situation was out of control, prevented the most conservative alternative of executing a missed approach from being adopted, compromising the quality of the decision-making process verified during the course of the incident.

Accident investigation:
cover
  
Investigating agency: CENIPA
Report number: 
Status: Investigation completed
Duration:
Download report: Final report

Sources:

IG-084/CENIPA/2015

Revision history:

Date/timeContributorUpdates
14-Jul-2023 19:29 harro Updated

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
www.FlightSafety.org