ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 385225
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can
submit corrected information.
Date: | Saturday 14 January 2023 |
Time: | 12:15 LT |
Type: | Cessna 182R |
Owner/operator: | C&c Specialty Inc |
Registration: | N9393H |
MSN: | 18267942 |
Year of manufacture: | 1981 |
Total airframe hrs: | 2139 hours |
Engine model: | Continental O-470-U |
Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 3 |
Aircraft damage: | Substantial |
Category: | Accident |
Location: | Las Animas, CO -
United States of America
|
Phase: | Approach |
Nature: | Training |
Departure airport: | Pueblo Memorial Airport, CO (PUB/KPUB) |
Destination airport: | Las Animas, CO |
Investigating agency: | NTSB |
Confidence Rating: | Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
Narrative:The airplane was on a visual approach for landing during an instructional flight when the stall warning sounded as it approached the runway threshold. The flight instructor told the student pilot to add engine power to avoid a hard landing. She added engine power, the airplane veered left, and then bounced on the runway while the stall warning continued to sound. The flight instructor then told her to add full engine power. She added full engine power and the airplane continued to veer left and did not climb. The airplane settled into a field adjacent to the runway and sustained substantial damage to the left horizontal stabilizer.
The application of engine power at a low airspeed would have necessitated greater control input to counter torque effects from the added power. The stall warning annunciation during the approach to landing was consistent with an unstabilized approach, during which an immediate go-around should have been instructed to the student pilot or performed by the flight instructor.
The flight instructor stated that the airplane should have attained a climb rate and attributed the lack of climb rate to an engine problem. The student pilot, however, attributed the lack of airplane climb rate to its low airspeed and high angle of attack during the go-around.
A postaccident engine examination and engine run revealed no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the engine that would have precluded normal operation.
Probable Cause: The student pilot's loss of control during approach for landing and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the approach and delay in ensuring a go-around was performed at the onset of a stall warning.
Accident investigation:
|
| |
Investigating agency: | NTSB |
Report number: | CEN23LA082 |
Status: | Investigation completed |
Duration: | 1 year and 2 months |
Download report: | Final report |
|
Sources:
NTSB CEN23LA082
History of this aircraft
Other occurrences involving this aircraft Location
Revision history:
Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
04-Apr-2024 08:04 |
ASN Update Bot |
Added |
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation